Skip to content

43579 vs Jet 60 Turbo Cordless Vacuums

Torn between 43579 and Jet 60 Turbo for your next cordless vacuum?

43579 cordless vac
Quest 43579
Jet 60 Turbo cordless vac
Samsung Jet 60 Turbo

We examine the 43579 – a battery-power vacuum by Quest, comparing runtime, dust tank, and costs, with – Jet 60 Turbo by Samsung, analysing real-world vacuuming performance.

By assessing these vacuums – the 43579 and Jet 60 Turbo from QUEST and SAMSUNG, you get the best floorcare machine.

Best Cordless Vacuum Pick

Best Pick

Best Buy: Shark PowerPro Cordless Stick Vacuum

Best cordless vacuum – Shark PowerPro – beating 43579 and Jet 60 Turbo on performance and value

Limited Offer

Get Deal

QUEST 43579 vs SAMSUNG Jet 60 Turbo – key Specifications

QUEST 43579 Specs

43579 vacuum specs
  • Product Brand: QUEST
  • Cordless Vacuum Model: 43579
  • Type of Vacuum: Handheld
  • Battery Life: 40 Minutes
  • Dirt Tank Capacity: 0.65L
  • Weight: 2.8KG
  • Colour: Black & Red
  • RRP: £125.00

SAMSUNG Jet 60 Turbo Specs

Jet 60 Turbo vacuum specs
  • Product Brand: SAMSUNG
  • Cordless Vacuum Model: Jet 60 Turbo
  • Type of Vacuum: Stick
  • Battery Life: 40 Minutes
  • Dirt Tank Capacity: 0.8L
  • Weight: 2.3KG
  • Colour: Teal Violet & Cotta Black
  • RRP: £299.00

43579 and Jet 60 Turbo Cordless Battery Run Time

QUEST Handheld cordless vacuums, like the 43579, provides lightweight portability without mains cables. Jet 60 Turbo Stick is also cordlessly powered by a SAMSUNG rechargeable battery.

The Samsung Jet 60 Turbo has a battery supply runtime of 40 minutes of cleaning, compared to the Quest 43579 which has 40 minutes life.

  • QUEST 43579 Runtime: 40 mins continuous vacuuming
  • SAMSUNG Jet 60 Turbo Runtime: 40 mins continuous vacuuming

Charging times between the 43579 and Jet 60 Turbo varies – check manual.

Cordless Vacuum Dust Tank Capacity

Both Quest 43579 and Samsung Jet 60 Turbo are bagless, storing dust, hairs, dirt, and debris inside a sealed 0.65 litre and 0.8 litre tank, respectively. The Jet 60 Turbo by SAMSUNG holds up to 0.8 Litre of compressed dirty particles. The 43579 by QUEST has a capable capacity of 0.65 litre for manual disposable.

  • 43579 onboard dirt/dust tank size: 0.65L
  • Jet 60 Turbo onboard dirt/dust tank size: 0.8L

Floor Cleaning Types

Quest’s 43579 and Samsung’s Jet 60 Turbo brush heads are effective on every surface – carpets & deep-pile rugs, hard floors (laminate, wood, tiles), vinyl, even upholstery, and stairs.

Their only limitation is the Jet 60 Turbo and 43579 can’t vacuum liquids. For this, a SAMSUNG or QUEST ‘wet and dry’ vacuum is needed.

Most Quest and Samsung battery powered vacuums include accessories. Check 43579 or Jet 60 Turbo manual for specifications and attachments.

Vacuum Filtration

The Jet 60 Turbo and QUEST 43579 include effective filters to capture dust, dander, pollen, hairs, and fibres.

QUEST and SAMSUNG use HEPA, foam, or cloth, filters. 43579 and Jet 60 Turbo maintain suction and clean exhaust air.

SAMSUNG and QUEST Reviews

Combined feedback from 22 reviewers shows the 43579 with a rating of 4.4/5 stars, and the Jet 60 Turbo vacuum gains a 4.4/5 average from 351 reviews, showing comparable reliability results.

BrandModelRuntimeWeightTankBest Price
QUEST4357940 M2.80.65L£125.00
SAMSUNGJet 60 Turbo40 M2.30.8L£299.00
Jet 60 Turbo vs 43579 Cordless Vac Specs
Best Pick

Best Buy: Shark PowerPro Cordless Stick Vacuum

Best cordless vacuum – Shark PowerPro – beating 43579 and Jet 60 Turbo on performance and value

Limited Offer

Get Deal