Skip to content

43579 vs Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK Cordless Vacuums

Torn between 43579 and Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK for your next cordless vacuum?

43579 cordless vac
Quest 43579
Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK cordless vac
Shark Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK

We examine the 43579 – a battery-power vacuum by Quest, comparing runtime, dust tank, and costs, with – Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK by Shark, analysing real-world vacuuming performance.

By assessing these vacuums – the 43579 and Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK from QUEST and SHARK, you get the best floorcare machine.

Best Cordless Vacuum Pick

Best Pick

Best Buy: Shark PowerPro Cordless Stick Vacuum

Best cordless vacuum – Shark PowerPro – beating 43579 and Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK on performance and value

Limited Offer

Get Deal

QUEST 43579 vs SHARK Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK – key Specifications

QUEST 43579 Specs

43579 vacuum specs
  • Product Brand: QUEST
  • Cordless Vacuum Model: 43579
  • Type of Vacuum: Handheld
  • Battery Life: 40 Minutes
  • Dirt Tank Capacity: 0.65L
  • Weight: 2.8KG
  • Colour: Black & Red
  • RRP: £125.00

SHARK Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK Specs

Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK vacuum specs
  • Product Brand: SHARK
  • Cordless Vacuum Model: Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK
  • Type of Vacuum: Handheld
  • Battery Life: 15 Minutes
  • Dirt Tank Capacity: 0.1L
  • Weight: 0.97KG
  • Colour: Blue Jean
  • RRP: £179.99

43579 and Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK Cordless Battery Run Time

QUEST Handheld cordless vacuums, like the 43579, provides lightweight portability without mains cables. Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK Handheld is also cordlessly powered by a SHARK rechargeable battery.

The Shark Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK has a battery supply runtime of 15 minutes of cleaning, compared to the Quest 43579 which has 40 minutes life.

  • QUEST 43579 Runtime: 40 mins continuous vacuuming
  • SHARK Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK Runtime: 15 mins continuous vacuuming

Charging times between the 43579 and Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK varies – check manual.

Cordless Vacuum Dust Tank Capacity

Both Quest 43579 and Shark Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK are bagless, storing dust, hairs, dirt, and debris inside a sealed 0.65 litre and 0.1 litre tank, respectively. The Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK by SHARK holds up to 0.1 Litre of compressed dirty particles. The 43579 by QUEST has a capable capacity of 0.65 litre for manual disposable.

  • 43579 onboard dirt/dust tank size: 0.65L
  • Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK onboard dirt/dust tank size: 0.1L

Floor Cleaning Types

Quest’s 43579 and Shark’s Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK brush heads are effective on every surface – carpets & deep-pile rugs, hard floors (laminate, wood, tiles), vinyl, even upholstery, and stairs.

Their only limitation is the Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK and 43579 can’t vacuum liquids. For this, a SHARK or QUEST ‘wet and dry’ vacuum is needed.

Most Quest and Shark battery powered vacuums include accessories. Check 43579 or Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK manual for specifications and attachments.

Vacuum Filtration

The Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK and QUEST 43579 include effective filters to capture dust, dander, pollen, hairs, and fibres.

QUEST and SHARK use HEPA, foam, or cloth, filters. 43579 and Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK maintain suction and clean exhaust air.

SHARK and QUEST Reviews

Combined feedback from 22 reviewers shows the 43579 with a rating of 4.4/5 stars, and the Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK vacuum gains a 4.4/5 average from 122 reviews, showing comparable reliability results.

BrandModelRuntimeWeightTankBest Price
QUEST4357940 M2.80.65L£125.00
SHARKWandvac 2.0 WV270UK15 M0.970.1L£179.99
Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK vs 43579 Cordless Vac Specs
Best Pick

Best Buy: Shark PowerPro Cordless Stick Vacuum

Best cordless vacuum – Shark PowerPro – beating 43579 and Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK on performance and value

Limited Offer

Get Deal