Skip to content

Jet 60 Turbo vs BU3521UK Cordless Vacuums

Torn between Jet 60 Turbo and BU3521UK for your next cordless vacuum?

Jet 60 Turbo cordless vac
Samsung Jet 60 Turbo
BU3521UK cordless vac
Shark BU3521UK

We examine the Jet 60 Turbo – a battery-power vacuum by Samsung, comparing runtime, dust tank, and costs, with – BU3521UK by Shark, analysing real-world vacuuming performance.

By assessing these vacuums – the Jet 60 Turbo and BU3521UK from SAMSUNG and SHARK, you get the best floorcare machine.

Best Cordless Vacuum Pick

Best Pick

Best Buy: Shark PowerPro Cordless Stick Vacuum

Best cordless vacuum – Shark PowerPro – beating Jet 60 Turbo and BU3521UK on performance and value

Limited Offer

Get Deal

SAMSUNG Jet 60 Turbo vs SHARK BU3521UK – key Specifications

SAMSUNG Jet 60 Turbo Specs

Jet 60 Turbo vacuum specs
  • Product Brand: SAMSUNG
  • Cordless Vacuum Model: Jet 60 Turbo
  • Type of Vacuum: Stick
  • Battery Life: 40 Minutes
  • Dirt Tank Capacity: 0.8L
  • Weight: 2.3KG
  • Colour: Teal Violet & Cotta Black
  • RRP: £299.00

SHARK BU3521UK Specs

BU3521UK vacuum specs
  • Product Brand: SHARK
  • Cordless Vacuum Model: BU3521UK
  • Type of Vacuum: Stick
  • Battery Life: 40 Minutes
  • Dirt Tank Capacity: 0.42L
  • Weight: 2.7KG
  • Colour: Navy Blue & White
  • RRP: £349.99

Jet 60 Turbo and BU3521UK Cordless Battery Run Time

SAMSUNG Stick cordless vacuums, like the Jet 60 Turbo, provides lightweight portability without mains cables. BU3521UK Stick is also cordlessly powered by a SHARK rechargeable battery.

The Shark BU3521UK has a battery supply runtime of 40 minutes of cleaning, compared to the Samsung Jet 60 Turbo which has 40 minutes life.

  • SAMSUNG Jet 60 Turbo Runtime: 40 mins continuous vacuuming
  • SHARK BU3521UK Runtime: 40 mins continuous vacuuming

Charging times between the Jet 60 Turbo and BU3521UK varies – check manual.

Cordless Vacuum Dust Tank Capacity

Both Samsung Jet 60 Turbo and Shark BU3521UK are bagless, storing dust, hairs, dirt, and debris inside a sealed 0.8 litre and 0.42 litre tank, respectively. The BU3521UK by SHARK holds up to 0.42 Litre of compressed dirty particles. The Jet 60 Turbo by SAMSUNG has a capable capacity of 0.8 litre for manual disposable.

  • Jet 60 Turbo onboard dirt/dust tank size: 0.8L
  • BU3521UK onboard dirt/dust tank size: 0.42L

Floor Cleaning Types

Samsung’s Jet 60 Turbo and Shark’s BU3521UK brush heads are effective on every surface – carpets & deep-pile rugs, hard floors (laminate, wood, tiles), vinyl, even upholstery, and stairs.

Their only limitation is the BU3521UK and Jet 60 Turbo can’t vacuum liquids. For this, a SHARK or SAMSUNG ‘wet and dry’ vacuum is needed.

Most Samsung and Shark battery powered vacuums include accessories. Check Jet 60 Turbo or BU3521UK manual for specifications and attachments.

Vacuum Filtration

The BU3521UK and SAMSUNG Jet 60 Turbo include effective filters to capture dust, dander, pollen, hairs, and fibres.

SAMSUNG and SHARK use HEPA, foam, or cloth, filters. Jet 60 Turbo and BU3521UK maintain suction and clean exhaust air.

SHARK and SAMSUNG Reviews

Combined feedback from 351 reviewers shows the Jet 60 Turbo with a rating of 4.4/5 stars, and the BU3521UK vacuum gains a 4.4/5 average from 128 reviews, showing comparable reliability results.

BrandModelRuntimeWeightTankBest Price
SAMSUNGJet 60 Turbo40 M2.30.8L£299.00
SHARKBU3521UK40 M2.70.42L£349.99
BU3521UK vs Jet 60 Turbo Cordless Vac Specs
Best Pick

Best Buy: Shark PowerPro Cordless Stick Vacuum

Best cordless vacuum – Shark PowerPro – beating Jet 60 Turbo and BU3521UK on performance and value

Limited Offer

Get Deal