Skip to content

Jet 60 Turbo vs Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK Cordless Vacuums

Torn between Jet 60 Turbo and Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK for your next cordless vacuum?

Jet 60 Turbo cordless vac
Samsung Jet 60 Turbo
Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK cordless vac
Shark Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK

We examine the Jet 60 Turbo – a battery-power vacuum by Samsung, comparing runtime, dust tank, and costs, with – Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK by Shark, analysing real-world vacuuming performance.

By assessing these vacuums – the Jet 60 Turbo and Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK from SAMSUNG and SHARK, you get the best floorcare machine.

Best Cordless Vacuum Pick

Best Pick

Best Buy: Shark PowerPro Cordless Stick Vacuum

Best cordless vacuum – Shark PowerPro – beating Jet 60 Turbo and Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK on performance and value

Limited Offer

Get Deal

SAMSUNG Jet 60 Turbo vs SHARK Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK – key Specifications

SAMSUNG Jet 60 Turbo Specs

Jet 60 Turbo vacuum specs
  • Product Brand: SAMSUNG
  • Cordless Vacuum Model: Jet 60 Turbo
  • Type of Vacuum: Stick
  • Battery Life: 40 Minutes
  • Dirt Tank Capacity: 0.8L
  • Weight: 2.3KG
  • Colour: Teal Violet & Cotta Black
  • RRP: £299.00

SHARK Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK Specs

Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK vacuum specs
  • Product Brand: SHARK
  • Cordless Vacuum Model: Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK
  • Type of Vacuum: Handheld
  • Battery Life: 15 Minutes
  • Dirt Tank Capacity: 0.1L
  • Weight: 0.97KG
  • Colour: Blue Jean
  • RRP: £179.99

Jet 60 Turbo and Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK Cordless Battery Run Time

SAMSUNG Stick cordless vacuums, like the Jet 60 Turbo, provides lightweight portability without mains cables. Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK Handheld is also cordlessly powered by a SHARK rechargeable battery.

The Shark Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK has a battery supply runtime of 15 minutes of cleaning, compared to the Samsung Jet 60 Turbo which has 40 minutes life.

  • SAMSUNG Jet 60 Turbo Runtime: 40 mins continuous vacuuming
  • SHARK Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK Runtime: 15 mins continuous vacuuming

Charging times between the Jet 60 Turbo and Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK varies – check manual.

Cordless Vacuum Dust Tank Capacity

Both Samsung Jet 60 Turbo and Shark Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK are bagless, storing dust, hairs, dirt, and debris inside a sealed 0.8 litre and 0.1 litre tank, respectively. The Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK by SHARK holds up to 0.1 Litre of compressed dirty particles. The Jet 60 Turbo by SAMSUNG has a capable capacity of 0.8 litre for manual disposable.

  • Jet 60 Turbo onboard dirt/dust tank size: 0.8L
  • Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK onboard dirt/dust tank size: 0.1L

Floor Cleaning Types

Samsung’s Jet 60 Turbo and Shark’s Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK brush heads are effective on every surface – carpets & deep-pile rugs, hard floors (laminate, wood, tiles), vinyl, even upholstery, and stairs.

Their only limitation is the Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK and Jet 60 Turbo can’t vacuum liquids. For this, a SHARK or SAMSUNG ‘wet and dry’ vacuum is needed.

Most Samsung and Shark battery powered vacuums include accessories. Check Jet 60 Turbo or Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK manual for specifications and attachments.

Vacuum Filtration

The Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK and SAMSUNG Jet 60 Turbo include effective filters to capture dust, dander, pollen, hairs, and fibres.

SAMSUNG and SHARK use HEPA, foam, or cloth, filters. Jet 60 Turbo and Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK maintain suction and clean exhaust air.

SHARK and SAMSUNG Reviews

Combined feedback from 351 reviewers shows the Jet 60 Turbo with a rating of 4.4/5 stars, and the Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK vacuum gains a 4.4/5 average from 122 reviews, showing comparable reliability results.

BrandModelRuntimeWeightTankBest Price
SAMSUNGJet 60 Turbo40 M2.30.8L£299.00
SHARKWandvac 2.0 WV270UK15 M0.970.1L£179.99
Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK vs Jet 60 Turbo Cordless Vac Specs
Best Pick

Best Buy: Shark PowerPro Cordless Stick Vacuum

Best cordless vacuum – Shark PowerPro – beating Jet 60 Turbo and Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK on performance and value

Limited Offer

Get Deal