Torn between Jet 60 Turbo and Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK for your next cordless vacuum?

VS

We examine the Jet 60 Turbo – a battery-power vacuum by Samsung, comparing runtime, dust tank, and costs, with – Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK by Shark, analysing real-world vacuuming performance.
By assessing these vacuums – the Jet 60 Turbo and Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK from SAMSUNG and SHARK, you get the best floorcare machine.
Best Cordless Vacuum Pick
Best Buy: Shark PowerPro Cordless Stick Vacuum
Best cordless vacuum – Shark PowerPro – beating Jet 60 Turbo and Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK on performance and value
Limited Offer
Get DealSAMSUNG Jet 60 Turbo vs SHARK Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK – key Specifications
SAMSUNG Jet 60 Turbo Specs

- Product Brand: SAMSUNG
- Cordless Vacuum Model: Jet 60 Turbo
- Type of Vacuum: Stick
- Battery Life: 40 Minutes
- Dirt Tank Capacity: 0.8L
- Weight: 2.3KG
- Colour: Teal Violet & Cotta Black
- RRP: £299.00
SHARK Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK Specs

- Product Brand: SHARK
- Cordless Vacuum Model: Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK
- Type of Vacuum: Handheld
- Battery Life: 15 Minutes
- Dirt Tank Capacity: 0.1L
- Weight: 0.97KG
- Colour: Blue Jean
- RRP: £179.99
Jet 60 Turbo and Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK Cordless Battery Run Time
SAMSUNG Stick cordless vacuums, like the Jet 60 Turbo, provides lightweight portability without mains cables. Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK Handheld is also cordlessly powered by a SHARK rechargeable battery.
The Shark Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK has a battery supply runtime of 15 minutes of cleaning, compared to the Samsung Jet 60 Turbo which has 40 minutes life.
- SAMSUNG Jet 60 Turbo Runtime: 40 mins continuous vacuuming
- SHARK Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK Runtime: 15 mins continuous vacuuming
Charging times between the Jet 60 Turbo and Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK varies – check manual.
Cordless Vacuum Dust Tank Capacity
Both Samsung Jet 60 Turbo and Shark Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK are bagless, storing dust, hairs, dirt, and debris inside a sealed 0.8 litre and 0.1 litre tank, respectively. The Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK by SHARK holds up to 0.1 Litre of compressed dirty particles. The Jet 60 Turbo by SAMSUNG has a capable capacity of 0.8 litre for manual disposable.
- Jet 60 Turbo onboard dirt/dust tank size: 0.8L
- Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK onboard dirt/dust tank size: 0.1L
Floor Cleaning Types
Samsung’s Jet 60 Turbo and Shark’s Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK brush heads are effective on every surface – carpets & deep-pile rugs, hard floors (laminate, wood, tiles), vinyl, even upholstery, and stairs.
Their only limitation is the Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK and Jet 60 Turbo can’t vacuum liquids. For this, a SHARK or SAMSUNG ‘wet and dry’ vacuum is needed.
Most Samsung and Shark battery powered vacuums include accessories. Check Jet 60 Turbo or Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK manual for specifications and attachments.
Vacuum Filtration
The Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK and SAMSUNG Jet 60 Turbo include effective filters to capture dust, dander, pollen, hairs, and fibres.
SAMSUNG and SHARK use HEPA, foam, or cloth, filters. Jet 60 Turbo and Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK maintain suction and clean exhaust air.
SHARK and SAMSUNG Reviews
Combined feedback from 351 reviewers shows the Jet 60 Turbo with a rating of 4.4/5 stars, and the Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK vacuum gains a 4.4/5 average from 122 reviews, showing comparable reliability results.
| Brand | Model | Runtime | Weight | Tank | Best Price |
| SAMSUNG | Jet 60 Turbo | 40 M | 2.3 | 0.8L | £299.00 |
| SHARK | Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK | 15 M | 0.97 | 0.1L | £179.99 |
Best Buy: Shark PowerPro Cordless Stick Vacuum
Best cordless vacuum – Shark PowerPro – beating Jet 60 Turbo and Wandvac 2.0 WV270UK on performance and value
Limited Offer
Get Deal